Sunday, January 20, 2008

College Basketball is Changing

Syracuse has been a victim to a new college game. It's faster and more aggressive. Teams are shooting the three ball at an increasing rate and the pool of talent is growing.

The NBA rule change that forces high school kids to go to college has forced players that used to play for the top BCS schools now are going to their second tier of teams in the BCS schools and the top mid-majors. Conferences like the Big East and PAC-10 might be the deepest those two conferences have ever been. In recent years the CAA, the MVC, and the Atlantic 10 have played to the level of BCS schools.

Teams that recruit one and done players will not be able to win national championships unless that one and done player enters a team one step away from a national championship. The mid-majors win with experience and three point shooting. The long ball has leveled the playing field for teams that can't draw the big name. They beat teams by recruiting players that might not nearly be the kind of play makers that BCS conference schools have, but can shoot the rock better than anyone.

This change in college basketball is affecting Syracuse. The Orange have been on a downfall since their national championship in 2003. During the last five years they have become increasingly victim to the three point shot when they play their trademark 2-3 zone. More and more players can hit the three point shot which is the easiest way to beat the zone.

From 2004 to 2008 the median team in the percentage of a team's points that come from the three pointer has increased consistently by 2.3% over that time period. The team that scored the highest percentage of their points by the three point shot in 2004 was Samford at 44.1%. In the top ten there were just two teams from BCS conference, the first was Oregon who went 18-13 in 2004 and Florida State who went 19-14. In 2008, the highest percentage belongs to one of Division I's newest teams, Presbyterian at 47.8%.

Most of the BCS conferences stayed consistent in the percentage of the points they get from the three point shot, while the mid-majors and minor conference schools have increasingly become more dependent on the three point shot. Team's ability to shoot the three is also increasing. The median team in 2004 was 34%, in 2008 it's 2008. It's increased almost every year in between. In the top ten during each year there is consistently only one or two BCS schools.

The ability to shoot the three stops the 2-3 zone in three different ways. It first has a direct effect on it. Teams can just shoot over it at will with more success. The three point shot also forces teams in the 2-3 to stretch the zone further out past the three point line. This allows gaps in the zone to open up. The baseline and and the area around the free throw are more accessible to the offense if the defense is stretched. Teams can do many different things in these areas given enough room when the zone is stretched. Two defenders are usually forced to collapse on the baseline leaving someone open on the court. The last way the three point shot can attack the zone is the long rebounds that are typical of missed three point attempts. The defender usually has the inside position to get the rebound, but many misses go over the heads of the defender and into the hands of the offense. It is also harder to box out in the zone.

This all is about to change.

The three point will be pushed back by one foot for the 2008-2009 season. The 2-3 zone will again become relevant again because it will force teams into three point shots that will be much harder to hit. Players who used to be able to hit the three won't shoot it anymore. Forwards and centers that occasionally found themselves behind the arc for a shot won't be shooting it anymore. Opposing teams have consistently shot better against Syracuse during the past five years from behind the arc. In 2008, teams have shot 35.4% from three. In 2004, that number was 28.9%. It has gotten worse every year. It can be argued, the team was worse defensively every year, but it also goes hand and hand with the notion teams are shooting better from three. Teams have more and more players every year that have the range to hit shots from 19'9'' feet. That number will be cut down dramatically when the line moves back to 20'9''.

The rest of the 2007-2008 season will bring struggles to the Orange, but things will be better in 2009. The zone will once again rise to be a dominating form of defense. At least for the first year of the new distance for three, teams will struggle trying to figure out the 2-3 zone when their players don't have the kind of accuracy to beat it from three.


3 comments:

Rush said...

very good research, interesting read. I'm not so sure moving the line back 12 inches will have a significant difference though - if they moved it back to the NBA line of course it would, but I wonder if one foot is a difference maker - shooters all have a lot of range these days. Donte, Jonny, guys like Eric Gordon at Indiana, can all hit from well beyound the arc. Its definitely something to watch for though.

Jameson Fleming said...

They might be able to hit those shots, but think of all the teams that burn Syracuse. Most are guys that are atypical nights shooting the ball. Push them back another foot and you're going to see them miss a lot more.

At least that's what I'm hoping.

Rush said...

I'm right there with ya, I love Boeheim, but at this point we know he's never going to abandon the 2-3


Google